National Geographic Channel going HD in January!

[dkennedy]

National Geographic Channel going HD in January!

August 11, 2005

Multichannel News Summary

Interview by Ken Kerschbaumer

Interview with John Ford, Executive Vice President, Programming National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is going HD in January. Like TNT and ESPN, the network will simultaneously deliver viewers an HD version of the SD channel, with about 90% of primetime programming expected to be shown in HD at launch (expect a similar percentage throughout the day depending on the number of primetime repeats). The addition of National Geographic HD gives fans of HD nature programs another option besides Discovery HD and PBS. HD Update chatted with NatGeo's programming chief, John Ford, about HD challenges and opportunities.

Q: I recall hearing that National Geographic has been laying the groundwork for the HD network for some time now.

A: Yes. We've been working for many months producing new shows in HD. Our policy right now is everything has to be shot in HD unless there's a problem like it relies on a lot of archive video that isn't available in HD. And even then you have to get a waiver.

Q: How different is it working in HD vs. SD?

A: There's a whole lot bigger picture, so photographers have to get used to the cameras taking in more. Also, the safe zones are different. There's sometimes an extra complication of getting the sound ready for 5.1 Surround Sound, so there's some extra time required in post production. But those are minor things: we've found we love shooting in HD and we don't want to shoot in SD anymore.

Q: Some people working in HD say it requires less cuts in editing so the viewer can soak in the picture.

A: We don't feel that way. If you watch at a movie from Hollywood with fast cuts in HD I don't think you feel it's going too fast for you. So we don't cut our shows differently.

Q: What HD format have you chosen?

A: We transmit in 720p but we'll accept content that is shot in either 720p or 1080i. We also own five Panasonic HD VariCam cameras but we don't require people to shoot with those cameras.

Q: How much more expensive is the typical production?

A: Right now it's in the range of 10% but we're working with producers to take it down. Some, in fact, own their own equipment and there is no extra up-charge for HD.

[hurnik]

Yeah, and we'll never see it on TW. Still waiting for Universal HD and some VOOM stations.

Satellite is looking better every day.

Although Verizon came through the Colonie area last Sat. and was poking around in everyone's back yards.

Guessing they're prepping for FIOS.

Can't wait. Drop TW like a hot brick.

[turboliner]

Where do you sleep at night Hurnik? TWC has added all the local networks that so many of us have requested, and has even launched Yes and ESPN HD. The $4 cost of the 6 hd networks in their tier as compared with paying twice that for similiar channels seems a great deal. If you want to drop a hot brick what is stopping you? I too look forward to seeing what FIOS will offer. One can only hope that all the new equipment they roll out to connect to the fiber to home network is reliable. Good competion though will keep both cable and satellite honest in the years to come.

Go be Verizon's guinea pig so it works when the rest of us decide to switch!

[MasterFX1]

In case you have forgotten, here's all the channels that are available and NOT currently carried by TWC:

STARZ-HD
MAX-HD
TMC-HD
ESPN2 HD
HBO-HD West
SHO-HD West
Starz-HD West
MAX-HD West
TMC-HD West
Universal HD
NFL-TV HD
NBA-TV HD
Wealth HD
Playboy Hot HD
Hustler HD
HDNews
Family Room HD
World Cinema HD
Film Fest HD
Kung Fu HD
Guy TV HD
Ha Ha HD
Majestic HD
Vice HD
Gunslingers HD
Divine HD
Monsters HD
Equator HD
WorldSport HD
Rush HD
Rave HD
Ultra HD
Auction HD
Gallery HD
Lab HD
Animania HD

Add the forthcoming HD channels like NGC-HD and OLN-HD and the list is rather long.

...And younger viewers will note that WEWB-DT (WB in HD) is still not on TWC, but is available OTA.

[hurnik]

Compared to what other cable comanies and satellite are offering, their HD offering is pathetic.

Last year I got whammied with a double price increase (effectively my bill went up $20/month in less than a year).

I got a letter in October stating my promotion was expiring and that I'd only pay $5/month more.

Then in Jan, they whacked $10 off the customer loyalty discount, and then jacked up the regular cable rates up on top of that.

NO new HD channels whilst satellite is adding them all the time.

I will simply bide my time (in theory within a year Verizon will be here with FIOS) and we'll see if TW decides to become competitive or not.

turboliner said:

Where do you sleep at night Hurnik? TWC has added all the local networks that so many of us have requested, and has even launched Yes and ESPN HD. The $4 cost of the 6 hd networks in their tier as compared with paying twice that for similiar channels seems a great deal. If you want to drop a hot brick what is stopping you? I too look forward to seeing what FIOS will offer. One can only hope that all the new equipment they roll out to connect to the fiber to home network is reliable. Good competion though will keep both cable and satellite honest in the years to come.

Go be Verizon's guinea pig so it works when the rest of us decide to switch!

[dkennedy]

National Geographic Goes HD

January 22, 2006

By Dale Cripps, HDTV Magazine

"This of all brands should be in HD."

National Geographic Interview: Mr. John Ford, Executive Vice President of Programming

The month marks both the fifth anniversary of the National Geographic Channel as well as the birth of NGC-HD, the much anticipated high-definition version. You can now receive all NGC in HDTV... well, you can if you do your part in calling both local cable and satellite operators with a demand that they carry it. (Call 1-877-77-NGCHD for more information).

It's been our tradition to interview the network brass who have had the courage to launch a HD channel. For the second time in our history we called upon Mr. John Ford, Executive Vice President NGC-HD programming. John shouldered much of the responsibilities as he engineered the launch of NGC-HD. I say "for the second time" because he is in the rarefied class of people who have launched more than one HDTV network, his first being the Discovery HD Theater back in 2001.

HDTV Magazine has always believed that the payoff for the expensive HDTV investment comes in the form of a cultural enrichment springing out of a clearer view and understanding of the real world. Certainly, penetrating programming is the chief requisite in fulfilling this promise. Scholars say that a successful world depends upon new growth in mutual understanding. Others emphasize the incalculable benefits produced by the introduction of beauty. "Creating understanding" while revealing intrinsic beauty has been a mission of National Geographic from its inception and now with the addition of HDTV the growth of both of these sympathetic vibrations is certain to impact our lives far into the future. We can and should be proud-professionals and consumers alike-to have played a part in this supra human challenge of giving birth to HDTV and, perhaps, a whole new era in which life once again seems to flourish.

NOW OUR INTERVIEW ...

HDTV Magazine: When did HDTV appear on your radar?

John Ford: It was clearly on my radar when I was launching Discovery HD Theater for Discovery. It was hovering in the background here when I joined National Geographic. Around the middle-to-the end of 2004 I was coming around to the fact that NGC needed to be an HDTV channel. We laid the ground work in February 2005, pulled the trigger and said to our producers that baring some compelling reason to do otherwise new projects from that date on must be in HDTV.

HDTV Magazine: Did I read correctly that you have 90% of the content for this year already in HD?

John Ford: Well, 90% of our prime time in the first quarter of 2006 is in HD. But that is not all. Some of our daytime programming has been produced anamorphically in Digibeta (a standard def digital format). Most of what we run in daytime, of course, is a repeat of prime time programming. There will be some early morning shows that were produced in January of last year (prior to the HD directive). They will be mostly in Digibeta anamorphic standard def. Being anamorphic the wide screen (without stretching) is filled. Interestingly enough we have more HDTV content (as a percentage) than does ESPN.

HDTV Magazine: It would seem pretty obvious that the content from National Geographic is perfect for HDTV.

John Ford: We are shooting authentic things in the real world, be that in nature, science, history or venture programs. The upgrade in the experience to high-definition from SDTV is greater for our type of programming than that for a movie or "how to" shows. The picture quality is now a part of the appeal of programming in our genre more than it might be for some others. Whether people or places or animals ... you can see more and see it better. It is far more like "being there" than with standard def. I think that is a big benefit.

HDTV Magazine: Do you have any special programs on your schedule that are going to be "knock outs"?

John Ford: The soonest is "Relentless Enemies". That is a two hour special shot on a little island near Botswana, Africa. You have trapped together there on this island several herds of buffalo and a pride of lions. Because the lions are always chasing down buffalo they get a great deal of exercise. Because they are eating buffalo they get a great deal of nutrition. They look like lions on steroids! It's an incredible show produced cinematically by a team who previously had only shot on film. They were reluctant to be brought into the HD world but I persuaded them. Now they love it. We may be able to get you an interview with them before that show airs. They will tell you how beautiful HD is and how wonderful it is for them. They are based in South Africa.

There is also an outstanding co-production on the Galapagos Island that we are doing with a British company. To your point earlier about the social benefit of HD, while we are not getting much look here at other human societies, we are getting a fantastic look at rare animal behaviors and life. A lot of this never-before-seen animal behavior comes only from the scope and clarity you get from HDTV.

HDTV Magazine: What format are you favoring for distribution and capture?

John Ford: We transmit in 720p. Those who shoot for us can use 720p or 1080i production equipment.

HDTV Magazine: Are you encouraging the use of those small prosumer HDTV DV cameras (Sony, Cannon, Ikegami)?

John Ford: We are not encouraging it. We are saying to producers that if you have a reason not to hang a $120,000 HD camera out the window of a speeding car holding it next to the wheels or over a cliff shooting a bird's next, you need a $3500 to $5000 camera. We will let you do that. But don't think of using it for other than those extreme occasions. We have one show that uses at one point 14 cameras to capture a collision between two cars. We wanted to see every angle. The rest of the show is in HD and we said it was OK to use those prosumer HD cameras much as you might with a home video. We could not justify the renting of 14 professional HD cameras to shoot that one segment. But the primary and secondary cameras are HDTV, even for this special scene.

HDTV Magazine: Are you aware of the manufacturer's competitive drive to produce and market 1080p displays?

HDTV Magazine: Was the choice of 720p transmission influenced by Fox Network Group (in joint-venture with National Geographic television)?

John Ford: Fox handles the uplink for us and they transmit in 720p, so it only made sense that our choice be 720p.

HDTV Magazine: Are you aware of the manufacturer's competitive drive to produce and market 1080p displays?

John Ford: Yes, we are aware that people are moving into 1080p. Certainly, we think more lines in progressive scan is a positive move. The only issue (remaining) is bandwidth.

HDTV Magazine: Is that (1080p) something you would trial after if the population of those monitors grew?

John Ford: That is hard to say. That would be a Fox corporate decision. They have a lot of sports to deal with and a lot of multi-camera shoots plus bandwidth restrictions. As we get to better bandwidth efficiency then the restrictions start to loosen up and you can more readily say, "let's go to 1080p" and not worry too much. But right now bandwidth is enough of an issue that I think 720p-given that it is progressive scan with a whole lot of lines going into it- is a very good choice.

HDTV Magazine: There is a growing cadre of video aficionados who have not been particular about much of anything until HDTV came along. They are now out counting pixels. They keep straining for every last bit of system performance that can be had. I can already predict that many from that group will say, "Oh, they have gone to 720p. What a catastrophe."

John Ford: We can certainly say that it is better than standard def. There are others who have embraced 720p without much comment. While you can switch back and forth between formats and see some differences, the 720p is such a quantum leap above standard def that I am confident people will be satisfied. Once they no longer are going back and forth trying to count the pixels, which to me defeats the purpose of enjoying your TV time, I am sure they will enjoy what we have to offer them. When you make the Galapagos Island look like a movie, you got something going.

We know that people are excited about the National Geographic brand in HD. All the surveys, and certainly anecdotally, people say, "This of all brands should be in HD." Consumer demand is already there. All we need to do is to get the word out and let them know that the channel is up and running. If they don't get it, call their cable and satellite provider.

HDTV Magazine: I note on your web site that you have a number to call for further information on how the public can reach and petition their carriers.

John Ford: Yes, that will get you in touch with your cable operators so you can call them and ask, "Do you carry NG-HD?" If not, then say, "I would like you to carry it." That kind of consumer interest does have an impact upon local market decisions. Bandwidth is scarce. It is always a choice as whether to use that bandwidth for telephony, other digital channels, etc. We know that the HDTV community loves their HDTV but there are just not enough channels. This is one way to stand up and say, "You know what; we want the National Geographic channel. If you are making room for whatever service it is, make sure you have room for NGC-HD.

HDTV Magazine: What carriage do you presently have?

John Ford: To answer this I must refer you to the person handling affiliate sales, but I do know that our affiliates are working on deals with several distributors.

HDTV Magazine: You presently have 56 million reached in standard def. What is your target with NGC-HD?

John Ford: We hope in one year to be in half of the HD homes.

HDTV Magazine: As you may have read there are a great many TV households who have HDTV capable monitors but without a HDTV signal to drive them. They either don't know or care about true HDTV. Many in the industry say this is a mater of continuing education of the public. Can we count you in on the educational process to the American public?

John Ford: On our standard network, which is a simulcast with our HD network, there will be an on-screen notification stating whenever a program is available in HDTV (which is most of them). Then we put up that 1 877 number.

HDTV Magazine: Is money-making important for your move to HDTV?

John Ford: It is only if you take the long view. Presently it is more of an expense and you can't really trace a whole lot of revenue back to it. But in the long run we believe it will pay off.

HDTV Magazine: The long run ... .is that five years? Ten years? Three years?

John Ford: I think we will see tangle results in three year's time.

HDTV Magazine: Thank you and good luck with this very significant launch.